What are criminal cases and punishment

what - are - criminal - cases - and - punishment

What are criminal cases and punishment

Whatever a person's peaceful and disciplined, and no matter how careful and away from the circle of crime, this does not prevent the occurrence of suspicious human, everyone is fair to suspect him as a defendant and then subjected to racially and arrest procedures, inspection, investigation and detention.

On the other hand, the accused has committed the offence of illegal and legal objectives (necessities permit prohibitions) without knowing it legitimacy, and that at the moment abandon even those closest to him, and in the face of legal action is tough, unforgiving media.

From this standpoint, the Act of an accused the right to be assisted by a lawyer, is one of the most serious penal laws on the person's life or freedom is his origins and art.

The ingredients for a successful criminal lawyer based on the science and art of the oral and written arguments, not flimsy shatara derived from gossip or manipulation of words and phrases.

The argument is not directed to the accused, or tickling feelings, but addressed to judge criminal law expert God deposited in his heart and in his mind the acumen to distinguish the wheat from the chaff.

The acquittal of the accused does not come out of thin air, but based on rules derived from the heavenly religions and culture struggled for freedom and thought human civilization.

So much wonder in amazement! What are the legal gaps that flips to a patent?

In a nutshell. They are not magic or metaphysical science, but are simply legal materials related to actions, called defences (no gaps) fluent use of successful criminal lawyer and convinces the Tribunal.

Therefore, we emphasize that our experience with criminal cases based on the contractor's first oral and written pleadings with defences and loopholes.

Whereas criminal defences leading to cancellation or mitigation of their consequences, for example:

Cancel the conviction and the verdict of acquittal.

The abolition of the death penalty or life imprisonment and the penalty of imprisonment of 3 years or less.

Judge abstentions on the punishment of the accused although he committed the crime.

Sentence of imprisonment with suspended sentence.

Hiring a lawyer-is a lawyer-judicial matters.

Hiring a lawyer-is a lawyer-judicial matters.

What is the importance of hiring a lawyer?

Law profession recognized since antiquity, the origins of logical and scientific grounds, and no public knowledge of Sciences complex and overlapping.

So whatever degrees for life experience or person, his use of a lawyer who specializes in judicial matters.

Because right however was clear in the case, and the judge however was fair, it is subject to legal controls and procedures to be adhered to, and possible loss of the case simply because of an error in procedure.

The judge ruled the case according to law, so not his defense for you if you ignored it, and the judge's time is precious, so don't hear opponents but what is a product, it does not allow any words being said, which has lose speech litigant in the case and to identify the product, and thus the case is no defense, but often find litigant decides against his interests without knowing that, despite his Right.

And confirmed the importance of hiring counsel to governmental authorities, members of Parliament, who begin law although they have legal advisers, they use lawyers, as well as companies, traders and experienced hiring lawyers.

Counsel by virtue of judicial expertise saves time and effort, so the litigant to balance the amount of fees that will be paid to the lawyer and the loss or gain of the proceedings as a whole.

I stayed the last word, is that in criminal matters, the hiring of a lawyer is mandatory, even if the accused refuses it, the judge assigned him a lawyer to defend him.

How to choose the right lawyer?

Important rules will help you to choose the right lawyer:

1 should be certified law firm check.

2 must meet Office owner personally and explain to him your case and not the Office workers so prefer to call the Office to schedule an appointment with the lawyer to meet him, and prefers to take a friend you trust when the lawyer.

3 explain the problem honestly and faithfully, and made all that you have documentation.

4 hear legal opinion without strain, counsel questions the dialectic and hypotheses are not present.

5 do not involve counsel, emotional and social problems, this is not one of competence.

6 don't mind to consult more than one counsel for comparison and weighting.

7 lawyer discussed the consensus and consulting other shave and clearly without dispute.

8 tell your lawyer whether you have another lawyer case until their coordination.

9 choose the lawyer comfortable with him and trust his work and expertise.

10 after agreement with the lawyer worked with Office staff so that each competence to serve your case.

Important warning:

Beware lawyer time is precious, do not consume his time so don't get offended you then chooses the shortcut in the legal answer.

Beware that you pretending intelligence and you yourself directly issue based on the information that you collect from lawyers because there are legal complications will be discussed with you as its attorney with justice and do not even fall in trouble cannot get ride of it.

What qualities of a successful lawyer?

1 lawyer filled with energy and vitality, and his confident smile activity.

2 the lawyer was revealed on the face and gravitas and experience of years.

3 the catch sight of a shrewd lawyer experienced issues which accommodates your words directly.

4 lawyer optimist alert the regulator listens attentively.

5 sincere counsel taciturn much work.

6 Counsel his experience in the profession.

7 lawyer deeply eloquent thought easy expression in speech signal.

Important warning:

Beware of guarantees and pledge to you that we will win the case 100 percent.

Beware of you decide that his power and influence over the judiciary.

Beware of you decide that bribing a court.

Beware of Attorney profession and lawyer trunk.

These swindlers offenders, you must inform the Kuwaiti Lawyers ' Association immediately, or contact us for help.

How to assess attorneys ' fees?

Kuwait has no sorry specific criterion to assess attorney fees, attorney fees varies from another lawyer here find some lawyers overly determine his remuneration for principal fatigue degree, others declining to below the level of the real costs of the case to the extent that it constitutes an actual loss on the desktop, thus affecting the effort, so the client is informed that helps in the correct estimate of the fees issue.

We can say that lawyer fees determined in accordance with the standard fixed costs and duration of the litigation, and the type of case, the effort by his experience.

Monthly and yearly costs:

As office rent, which varies from region to region and from one place to another, the rent on an apartment or investment, not as a rent in the commerical capital, where the rent per square metre, a lawyer who chooses a distinctive place and close to clients and courts to doubt that carrying costs more.

As well as wages and salaries of advisers and staff which vary according to the skill of them all and the number and competence.

And also electricity and water expenses, transport and communication and maintenance of hardware, software, and publications, papers and inks, as well as fees and lawyers ' insurance contributions which vary according to the degree of being a lawyer.

These banks represent the minimum for any issue which cannot get off him and not cause material loss and burden on the lawyer.

The cause of his wife's killer intelligence and subtle lawyers judge

the-cause-of-his-wifes-killer

The cause of his wife's killer intelligence and subtle lawyers judge

When the Court almost pronounce death for killer of his wife and that her body was not found despite all evidence incriminating the husband. Stopping defence counsel regarding any straw to save his client and then told the judge: to issue a death sentence to killer. To be available to the Court certain doubt that the accused had killed the victim. And now.. Enter from the door of the Court. Strong evidence for the innocence of my client and his wife live provide with the means of subsistence and the opening for the Court attention went both in the room to the door. After moments of silence and anticipation. No one enters the door and here's lawyer. Everyone was waiting for entry of 2,780!! This confirms that you have 100% convinced that my client killed his wife here in Hall liked intelligently lawyer. And judges trading position. The surprise ruling came a death sentence for sure doubt that the man killed his wife!!! And after people questioned how such a provision renders the individual judge simply. When the lawyer suggested to us all that the wife did not kill and still alive. All eyes went to the door, waiting for entry only one person in the room!!! He accused husband!!! He knows very well that his wife killed. And that the dead do not walk.

a note on misdemeanor drunk in defence

a note on misdemeanor drunk in defence

Defense of accused

Judge Sir intolerance vilified erring reason and blinding insight is well known to you that usually attack policemen are usually inappropriate for their injustice to a lot of honorable policemen and performing their duty faithfully fearing God.

This provided-which had to be — we ask why not write Mr. alzabet in his presence what actually happens only if cryptic Chia? Otherwise we launched for ourselves unleashed behind the physical doctrines owners who they confirm that if God exists, anything goes, even murder.

Do drink schnapps and selection of reality:

Article 7 of Act No. 63 of 1976 prohibition drink wine at that.

(Whoever sets in a public place or in a place in drunk between the imprisonment of at least two weeks and not more than six months or by a fine of not less than twenty pounds and not exceeding one hundred pounds)

It is clear from the text of article 7 above – that the offence extends to areas of article VII is the presence of the accused was drunk in a public place or place of the year – and did not mention that the accused editor was lurching or can't stand the kadamih of drunk or was in an agitated state as a result of Biskra Albin but each note Mr. Editor-record statement record-that the accused mouth almost smell smelt alcohol.

It makes us ask why astkavh his question but this last subject distances us from our defense.

Vast difference between drinker and drunk.

There is no doubt that there is a vast difference between even drunk, drinker, not every drinker drunk but that the opposite is true and that we assume controversy-and the truth is not imposition Yarka. from here we will not deny the fact of eating schnapps but deny reality sugar itself. The tourist facilities authorized to sell liquor licensed establishments are so so this activity is prohibited or restricted, the text of Act No. 63 of 1976 in article 2:

(Prohibited or alcohol or alcoholic or fermented in public places or public stores, and are excluded from this provision.

(A) the specific hotels and tourist establishments in accordance with the provisions of law No. 1 of 1979 on hotel and tourism establishments

(B) tourist nature clubs specified by decision of the Minister of tourism in accordance with the provisions of law No. 77 of 1975 concerning community foundations for youth and sports.

The above-mentioned law in the fifth article of the offense and the penalty is imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, by a fine not exceeding two hundred pounds or to both.

(Appeal No. 3695 year 58 BC meeting 12/1/1988)

 ..... Consequently, we insist that our payment is the absence of sugar or no-incident incident accused drunk to the defendant if the – presumably – dealt with the bottle of beer licensed trade by the Government – a tourist establishments licensed in liquor, it is not necessary to be drunk and extends areas Act 63 of 1975 on the prohibition of drinking alcohol that punishment of the accused must be drunk between either simply accused of drink Beer without being drunk, not punishment.

 When the defendant's punishment is located an intoxicated?

 for punishment of the accused from the fact of its existence drunk between one of the two images:

 first image: the accused was drunk in the road and not in deed.

 the second picture: that with a bottle of liquor bottles and accused any kind on which the highway here is subject to the law extends to not punish Ali addressed within tourist establishments licensed either alcohol to main road openly is what not allowed and punishable.

 inadequate medical report but invalidated:

The medical report came free from the seal of the Republic logo, and the doctor did not sign a medical examination of the accused, but in his words echoed EIRP is transferred from the leaf record. said Dr. 's report accused

(Mentioned in drunk and out of his mouth the smell of alcohol) and had to take a blood sample for analysis as accused prosecutors in its report, but he did nothing in his said, is what makes us question the doctor's errand.

This doctor is not affiliated with llzabet in his presence either enough humiliation suffered by people of some policemen do satisfy the justice that this humiliation also doctor who God has given key to part of the secret of the creation of learn the secrets of the human body and comfort.

And a descent of all the above on their case as seen by the defence witness, who was accompanied by the defendant in returning to the House where the free alzabet for this witness also a mischievous yet another student with a personal card, squashes and threw away the witness testified that alzabet so diversified in the edited records edited minutes of sugar to a friend of the accused and another transcript has also confirmed that his friend wasn't drunk but the intransigence of the officer and the desire to edit records even if contrary to the truth behind Edit this record.

We are a sit-in in defense before the justice court what we lack sugar incident and the invalidity of the medical report.

We are nlgaa to you after God Almighty for rebut the falsehood and show right and explore the between the lines and reach the truth of things.

Let us recall telling the Secretary with his sincere Roy from Aisha said: the Muslimsfend off limits, what you can. It was his way out, let him. The Imam of the errs in pardon is better for him than to err in punishment, the Messenger of Allah peace be upon him.

For that

The accused sought Court Justice accepting payment in the absence of reality and elimination of sugar has pleaded not guilty, which is attributed to him.

Accused agent

Attorney

The history of the judiciary in the State of Kuwait

The history of the judiciary in the State of Kuwait

The judiciary is one of the most important pillars set by the State of Kuwait on the priorities for attention and find recent remarkable development in the judicial system in the State of Kuwait where the arbitrator all high mutation levels access to provide better services to citizens and residents.

And the Organization of the Judiciary Act established the State of Kuwait in 1959 and then repealed this law, Decree-Law No. 23 of 1982 and then modify some of the provisions of this law, Decree-Law No. 10 of 1996. Elimination the next legislature and executive performance message is inherently independent of those powers.

Courts in the State of Kuwait to consider in all disputes and offences except those excluded by the text, Kuwaiti law all types of rules jurisdiction of those courts.

The right to nationality and citizenship

The right to nationality and citizenship

The right to nationality

The right to citizenship is a basic human right. It is everyone's right to acquire, change or retain nationality.

Under international human rights law that the right of States to decide who are its nationals is not absolute, and that States should, in particular, compliance with human rights obligations regarding the granting of citizenship and forfeitures.

Arbitrary deprivation of nationality

Right to retain citizenship corresponds to the prohibition of arbitrary deprivation of nationality. Accordingly, arbitrary deprivation of nationality than actually deprive affected persons with regard to their enjoyment of human rights, given that some of these rights may be subject to legal restrictions do not apply otherwise, given also the increased vulnerability to human rights violations.

International legal framework

The right to a nationality is recognized in a variety of international legal instruments, including the Universal Declaration of human rights, the International Convention on the Elimination of all forms of racial discrimination, the International Covenant on Civil and political rights, the Convention on the rights of the child, the Convention on the Elimination of all forms of discrimination against women, the Convention on the nationality of married women, the Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities and the International Convention on the protection of the rights of all migrant workers and members of their families and the issue of nationality in relation to the Convention on the reduction of statelessness and the Convention relating to the status of stateless persons and the Convention relating to the status of refugees.

It can also be found in numerous international instruments to prohibit explicitly the year of arbitrary deprivation of nationality. It should be noted in particular that article 15 of the Universal Declaration of human rights clearly states that no one may be deprived of his/her nationality arbitrarily. As approved by the General Assembly, in its resolution 50/153, the basic nature of the prohibition of depriving any person of his or her nationality arbitrarily.

The right to nationality and the Human Rights Council

The Human Rights Council addressed the enjoyment of the right to a nationality and to avoid situations of statelessness in several resolutions on "human rights and arbitrary deprivation of nationality".

Resolution 7/10 (2008)

Resolution 10/13 (2009)

Resolution 13/2 (2010)

Resolution 20/4 on the right to a nationality: women and children (2012)

Resolution 20/5 (2012)

Resolution 20/14 (2014)

Previous reports

Report of the Secretary-General on human rights and arbitrary deprivation of nationality-A/HRC/10/34

Report of the Secretary-General on human rights and arbitrary deprivation of nationality-A/HRC/13/34

Report of the Secretary-General on human rights and arbitrary deprivation of nationality-A/HRC/19/43

Report on discrimination against women in matters related to sexuality, including its impact on children-A/HRC/23/23

Report of the Secretary-General on human rights and arbitrary deprivation of nationality-A/HRC/25/28

The work of the Office of the High Commissioner for human rights on the right to nationality and statelessness

The Office of the High Commissioner for human rights, through many field offices, technical advice on the laws and policies concerning nationality in order to achieve compatibility with international human rights standards.

And in particular women's right to nationality, invites the Office of the High Commissioner for human rights to reform of citizenship laws that discriminate against women and affect the enjoyment of the rights of children and her husband. And in 2013, OHCHR submitted a report to the Human Rights Council on the issue entitled "discrimination against women in matters relating to nationality (A/HRC/23/23). The report examines how the lack of women in some countries equal rights with men to acquire, change and retention of nationality, and also how not to allow women to transfer their nationality to their children and husband on the same basis, which resulted in too many instances, cases of statelessness. The report analyzes the negative impact of discriminatory nationality laws on women's enjoyment of their rights and the enjoyment of the rights of children and of her husband, It also includes best practices and other measures to eliminate discrimination against women in nationality laws. The report provides a comprehensive framework of commitments and actions directed to the full implementation of human rights obligations in the area of equal citizenship rights.

OHCHR supports human rights campaign to end statelessness, launched by the United Nations High Commissioner for refugees. During the fifty-ninth session of the Commission on the status of women, jointly by OHCHR and the United Nations High Commissioner for refugees and the United Nations for women organized a high-level Panel discussion on 10 March 2015, on equal citizenship rights.